Log in

No account? Create an account
If you don't know what this is about, don't worry. - Songs of innocence and of experience [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Douglas Spencer

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

[Friends| (full) (people) (communities) (both) (feeds) (friendsfriends) ]
[Using| (new) (rec) (clu) (inb) (tag) (bot) (adm) (mod) (poll) ]
[Other| (DJ) (DW) (IJ) (JF) (Scribbld) ]
[Me| (AoOO) (eF) (FB) (GP) (LI) (Tu) (Tw) (Wk) ]
[Links| (AVDAR) (Exchange) (il_calmo) (LGCM) (ZZ9) ]

If you don't know what this is about, don't worry. [Oct. 5th, 2009|09:21 pm]
Douglas Spencer

In order to dispel any doubt that there may be over my opinion on the matter:

Firstly, It's my firm belief that the correct response of a convention committee hearing criticism of their convention, or its current or previous committees, is to prove those critics wrong by running a great event.

Secondly, it seems to me that banning your critic from your event, refusing to enter into any online discussion on the matter, and refusing to discuss it with any other persons, seems (on the face of it) to be a little odd.

Thirdly and finally, I'm trying to remember any occasion when a committee has banned a critic and then refused to discuss it, and then gone on to find that their public image has improved in any way. No success yet.

Anonymous comment spam:
2011-01-29 19:21 (from
2011-03-05 20:59 (from

[User Picture]From: bellinghman
2009-10-06 09:24 am (UTC)
Oh dear me, that's sad.

And there was one a couple of weeks back not that far east from your profiled position of which I heard nothing but praise, and to which we might well have wanted to go if there was a repeat (even though it's quite a distance from East Anglia). I hope it wasn't that one.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: raccoona
2009-10-06 11:17 am (UTC)
If we're thinking of the same con it wouldn't surprise me. Knowing that there were already people angry at having their offers of help rebuffed and ignored in the run up to this year's.

(Using an obvious sock here. Not for any reason more nefarious than not having the energy at pesent to devote to potentially getting involved in a big fannish row with the tantrums and the grudges and the satirical fanzines and oye....).
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: the_maenad
2009-10-06 02:36 pm (UTC)
If nothing else, that has to be the most wonderfully esoteric name for a sockpuppet account ever. Kudos!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)